OUR NEW PROFILE IS: NASDAQ: USAU
CHECK OUT THE INVESTOR PRESENTATION HERE
U.S. Gold Corp. Inc.’s World-Class Assets Could Be An Explosive Play For Both Inflation and the EV Boom
U.S. Gold Corp. Announces Positive Prefeasibility Study Citing a Pre-Tax NPV of $323 Million and IRR of 39.4%
Company Provides Updates on Fast-Track Development Plan Progress
CHEYENNE, Wyo., Dec. 1, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — U.S. Gold Corp. (NASDAQ: USAU) (“U.S. Gold” or the “Company”), a gold exploration and development company, is pleased to announce that it has completed the prefeasibility study (“PFS”) for the Company’s CK Gold Project and has published its SK-1300 Technical Report Summary.
Prefeasibility Study Highlights:
- Mineral Resources – 1.58 million gold equivalent (“AuEq”) ounces of Measured and Indicated (M+I) Resources
- Mineral Reserves – 1.44 million AuEq ounces of Proven and Probable (P1 and P2) Reserves
- 10-year Mine Life at 20,000 short tons per day process rate
- Initial Capital: $221 million
- Robust Economics – 39.4% IRR before tax and 33.7% IRR after tax
- Upside Potential
- Permitting and Development
Development Plan Progress Highlights:
- 2021 Field Season – a successful field season concluded November 2021
- Ongoing Test-Work – geochemical, metallurgical for completion in Q1 2022
- Interviewing FS and EPCM engineering firm candidates, with RFPs to be submitted
- Continued Social and Wyoming Government Outreach
U.S. Gold Corp.’s President & CEO, Mr. George Bee commenting on the study and progress said, “We have taken our time to carefully consider and optimize the potential of the CK Gold Project. From the outset and prior to me joining U.S. Gold Corp., the potential of the project in today’s market was obvious. A deposit that outcrops on surface with a very low waste-to-ore ratio seemed to be attractive. The fact that the project is located in an excellent jurisdiction, well versed in the extractive industries, with everything that we need on the project doorstep, makes it a very attractive. The work that we have done over the last year has confirmed and improved upon previous metallurgical test work and we have set about doing the work to ensure that there will be little or no non-manageable negative impacts on the environment and local community. On the contrary, some 200-plus full-time high-paying jobs, royalty payments to the state for K-12 education, tax payments and investment in the community all accrue from a project that is relatively simple with no danger from tailings, no refinery or smelter emissions, and a benign process.”
The Founder of U.S. Gold Corp., Mr. Ed Karr, who continues to be involved with the Company, added, “We pivoted the Company to focus on development of the CK Gold Project, setting aside, for now, the compelling exploration portfolio we have in Nevada and Idaho. This decision has proven to be exceptional as we are poised to capture improvements in the gold and copper market in a project that can be brought to book in short order. Considering the findings of the PFS study in the context of today’s metal prices, we seem to be on the precipice of realizing exceptional value from a project whose time has come. We also are intrigued by the upside potential the CK Gold Project holds as we look at the potential value of the aggregate the project can produce at a time when development in the vicinity of the project is increasing and the United Statesembarks on its infrastructure renovation and development program.” Mr. Karr, with extensive experience in capital markets, went on to say, “In a safe jurisdiction with the potential for extremely competitive debt lines on both development capital and equipment purchases, we believe we will be able to raise the necessary capital to fund project development.”
A link to the PFS report is available on the Company’s website.
Property Summary and Ownership
Gustavson Associates, LLC (Gustavson) was commissioned by U.S. Gold to prepare a Preliminary Feasibility Study (PFS) for the CK Gold Project (the “Project”). The effective date of their report is November 15, 2021.
The CK Gold Project is located in Laramie County, Wyoming, in the southeastern portion of the state, approximately 20 miles west of Cheyenne. It is centered in the north half of Section 36, T14N, R70W. The property encompasses approximately 1,120 acres of mineral leases on Section 36, south half Section 25 and northeast quarter Section 35. Additionally, to accommodate the mine footprint for facilities, primarily the tailings storage facility, which cannot be accommodated on State Section 36, an option agreement for a further 712 acres on portions of Section 25 and Section 31 has been secured with the private landowner. Unless otherwise specified, all units are imperial and in U.S. dollars
Mineral Resource Statement
Mark C. Shutty, CPG and Christopher Emanuel, SME-RM are the Qualified Persons responsible for the mineral resource estimation in Leapfrog and Vulcansoftware, relying on the geologic database accumulated over the project life. In the QPs opinion, the resources presented reasonably represent the in-situ resources for the CK Gold Project using all available data as of the effective date. Mineral Resources are reported at a gold equivalent grade (AuEq) cutoff grade, which considers metal recovery and pricing. Cutoff grade varies with expected recovery for delineated material types, but averages 0.009 ounces per short ton (oz/st) AuEq, equivalent to 0.31 grams per metric tonne (g/t) AuEq. The resource is constrained inside an optimization pit shell which, combined with the cutoff grade, represents reasonable prospects for economic extraction. Table 1–1 and Table 1–2 contain the tabulation of the mineral resources for the CK Gold Project on the effective date of this report.
|Table 1–1 Mineral Resource Statement|
|Mass||Gold (Au)||Copper (Cu)||Silver (Ag)||Au Equivalent
|M + I||81,800||1,110||0.014||280||0.171||3,220||0.039||1,580||0.019|
|1Resources tabulated at a cutoff grade of (0.0107 – 0.0088) AuEq oz/st, 0.009 AuEq oz/st average|
|2Note only 3 significant figures shown, may not sum due to rounding|
|Table 1–2 Mineral Resource Statement (Metric)|
|Mass||Gold (Au)||Copper (Cu)||Silver (Ag)||Au Equivalent (AuEq)|
|M + I||74,200||1,110||0.467||127||0.171||3,220||1.347||1,580||0.660|
|1Resources tabulated at a cutoff grade of (0.37 – 0.30) AuEq g/t, 0.31 AuEq g/t average|
|2Note only 3 significant figures shown, may not sum due to rounding|
The estimates of Mineral Resources may be materially affected if mining, metallurgical, or infrastructure factors change from those currently anticipated at the CK Gold Project. Estimates of inferred mineral resources have significant geological uncertainty and it should not be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will be converted to the measured or indicated categories. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not meet the threshold for reserve modifying factors, such as estimated economic viability, that would allow for conversion to mineral reserves.
Mineral Reserve Statement
Mineral reserves are based on an open pit mine design and production schedule using reasonable design parameters. Measured mineral resources within the mine design and schedule convert to proven mineral reserves and indicated mineral resources convert to probable mineral resources. Metal prices used in cutoff grade calculation and economic analysis are $1,625/oz Gold, $3.25/lb Copper and $18/oz Silver. The mineral reserves are reported at a variable cutoff grade, as recovery varies by material type. Average cutoff grade is 0.009 oz/st AuEq (0.31 g/t AuEq). Table 1–3 and Table 1–4 contain the tabulation of the mineral reserves for the CK Gold Project on the effective date of this report.
|Table 1–3 Mineral Reserves Statement|
|Mass||Gold (Au)||Copper (Cu)||Silver (Ag)||Au Equivalent
|P1 + P2||70,400||1,010||0.014||248||0.176||2,660||0.038||1,440||0.020|
|1Reserves tabulated at a cutoff grade of (0.0107 – 0.0088) AuEq oz/st, 0.009 AuEq oz/st average|
|2Note only 3 significant figures shown, may not sum due to rounding|
|Table 1–4 Mineral Reserve Statement (Metric)|
|Mass||Gold (Au)||Copper (Cu)||Silver (Ag)||Au Equivalent (AuEq)|
|P1 + P2||63,800||1,010||0.494||112||0.176||2,660||1.295||1,440||0.700|
|1Reserves tabulated at a cutoff grade of (0.37 – 0.30) AuEq g/t, 0.31 AuEq g/t average|
|2Note only 3 significant figures shown, may not sum due to rounding|
There are no known relevant factors that would materially affect the estimation of mineral reserves that are not discussed in this report.
Geology and Mineralization
The Silver Crown Mining District, where the Project is located, is underlain by Proterozoic rocks that make up the southern end of the Precambrian core of the Laramie Range. Metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of amphibolite-grade metamorphism are intruded by the approximately 1.4-billion-year-old Sherman Granite and related felsic rocks. Within the project area, foliated granodiorite is intruded by aplitic quartz monzonite dikes, thin mafic dikes and younger pegmatite dikes. Shear zones with cataclastic foliation striking N60°E to N60°W are found in the southern part of the Silver Crown district, including at CK Gold. Copper and gold mineralization at the Project occurs primarily in unfoliated to mylonitic granodiorite. The granodiorite typically shows potassium enrichment, particularly near contacts with quartz monzonite. Mineralization is associated with a N60°W-trending shear zone.
CK Gold mineralization has been interpreted as a shear-zone controlled, disseminated and stockwork gold-copper deposit in Proterozoic intrusive rocks. Most of the mineralization is in granodiorite, with lesser amounts in quartz monzonite and thin mafic dikes. Hydrothermal alteration is overprinted on retrograde greenschist alteration and includes a central zone of silicification, followed outward by a narrow potassic zone, surrounded by propylitic alteration. Higher grade mineralization occurs within a central core of thin quartz veining and stockwork mineralization that is surrounded by a zone of lower-grade disseminated mineralization. Disseminated sulfides and native copper with stockwork malachite and chrysocolla are present at the surface, and chalcopyrite, pyrite, minor bornite, primary chalcocite, pyrrhotite, and native copper are present at depth. Gold occurs as free gold.
Metallurgical test work was carried out over many years by various companies, including a test work program at SGS, Canada, in 2008-2010 which established that flotation was the most suitable method to process CK Gold mineralization. In 2020, U.S. Gold carried out a drilling program, with seven holes located across the deposit, specifically for new samples for metallurgical test work. Three composites were prepared, namely sulfide, oxide and high-grade oxide. These samples were tested at two laboratories, KCA in Reno, USA, and Base Metals in Kamloops, Canada. This work confirmed and improved upon the SGS results with gold recovery in a range of 67-74% and copper recovery of 83-88% for the majority sulfide material. Copper concentrate of 21-25%Cu was achieved with high values of gold, (50-80 g/t Au) and silver, (50-60 g/t Ag). Preliminary cyanidation of the flotation tailings suggests that gold recovery could be increased to over 90% using a two-stage flotation-cyanidation process. This will be further investigated in the Feasibility Study and may present an opportunity for the project. This work is provided in Section 10.2 of the PFS report. The test work reports by SGS, KCA and Base Metals are all available from U.S. Gold.
Mine Design, Optimization and Scheduling
The CK Gold Project is planned as an open pit mine with a mine production life of approximately 9.5 years. Two independent mine planning and sequencing studies have been accomplished and the studies show broad agreement. Lerchs-Grossmann Pit optimization analysis was performed using reasonable design and economic parameters and the result used to guide the mine design process.
Four pit phases were designed and material movement was scheduled on an annual basis. Pit design parameters are based on a geotechnical drilling program and detailed stability analysis. A contractor mining operating model is used for mine operations, tailings disposal, and site support. The Project owner operates the process plant, provide supervision of contractors, mine planning, ore control and provides general site administration (G&A). This hybrid owner/contractor model is used to leverage the regional mine contractor expertise and reduce initial project capital costs.
The Engineering design work was developed by Alquimia/Innomet in Santiago, Chile, which was selected based on their in-depth experience with flotation copper concentrators. They developed flowsheets, general arrangement drawings and capital and operating costs based on the SGS test work, and updated with the latest results from Base Metals, as well as specific comminution test work by Hazen Research in Denver, Mineralogy by FLSmidth in Salt Lake City and thickening/filtration test work by Pocock International, also in Salt Lake City.
The current process flowsheet uses a single-stage crushing plant receiving run of mine (ROM) ore and stacking crushed ore on a reclaim-feeder-equipped stockpile. The semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill is fed crushed ore at a nominal rate of 20,000 short tons per day (stpd) (18,150 tonnes per day) and is in closed circuit with a ball mill, two pebble crushers and two banks of cyclones, which produces a product for flotation. A flotation circuit, with regrind after rougher flotation, will produce a bulk floatation concentrate. Tailings will be thickened and dried using filter presses for dry stack disposal. Opportunities exist to eliminate equipment and reduce capital cost through various measures, such as the elimination of ball mills from the circuit, elimination of a pebble crusher and cyclone bank and optimization of the tailings preparation, resulting in less filtration.
Environmental, Permitting and Community Impact
Current exploration activities are fully permitted through the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Permit # DN0440. Planned surface disturbance of 40 acres during current exploration activities is fully bonded for reclamation purposes. U.S. Gold conducts concurrent reclamation and practically all exploration disturbance has been reclaimed at the end of the 2021 field season. The practice of concurrent reclamation is envisioned for the proposed operation. The Project is in the process of compiling the information required for the eventual permit applications. No permit applications for mine construction or operation have been submitted to any regulators at this time.
The CK Gold Project will occupy state-owned and private land. Construction and operation of the mine will require various permits issued at the state and local levels. The agency with primary jurisdiction over development and operation of the Project is the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The applicable permits required under this agency include:
- Permit to Mine,
- Air Quality Permit to Construct and Operate,
- Industrial Siting Construction Permit,
- Stormwater Permit,
- Permit to Construct Water Supply and Wastewater Facilities, and
- Operator Certification for Drinking Water Systems.
Additional permits will be needed from the following agencies:
- State Engineer’s Office Permits for Water Use and Water Related Facilities,
- State Historical Preservation Office,
- State Fire Marshall, and
- Laramie County.
Two streams flowing through the Project site have been classified as “Waters of the United States” by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“ACoE”). However, none of the planned project infrastructure would impact these surface waters, therefore no major federal permitting will be required. Following the submission of a wetland survey and site inspections by the ACoE, the footprint of the project was deemed non-jurisdictional in February 2021.
Environmental baseline studies began in October 2020, post a pre-Application Meeting with the Wyoming DEQ, to establish the pre-mining site conditions and fulfill the information requirements of the permit application documents to be submitted to the DEQ and other applicable regulators. These studies are ongoing with a full 12-month dataset and will continue through 2022 until the permit application is submitted.
Geochemical testing of mine rock and tailings samples indicate that the tailings will not be acid generating, nor will the majority of waste rock and pit wall rock. Therefore, the risk of metal leaching from waste rock, tailings and pit walls, and associated potential impacts on water quality, are not expected to be significant. This finding will be confirmed through ongoing geochemical testing.
Waste rock and tailings generated during mining and mineral processing will be deposited on site in engineered facilities. The tailings will be filtered to extract as much moisture as feasible for water conservation and recycling back to the plant prior to their deposition. This will assist in maximizing their structural strength and avoid the need for tailings dams and their associated structural stability risks. Furthermore, fine tailings stacked in the tailing storage facility (TSF) will be contained and buttressed with coarse run-of-mine rock from open pit mine to ensure long-term stability and dust control.
U.S. Gold has also reached out and provided Project information to various additional local entities that may be affected by and/or interested in the project, including: Laramie County; City of Cheyenne; City of Laramie; neighboring residents and property owners west of the Project site; Wyoming State Parks; Wyoming Game and Fish Department; Wyoming School Boards Association; University of Wyoming; Granite Canyon Quarry, which operates an aggregate quarry 3-miles south of the Project site; and the Ferguson, Sutherland and King Ranches, cattle ranching operations on and around the Project site. There are no indigenous, Native American or Bureau of Indian Affairs lands adjacent to the Project, and no indigenous or Native American cultural sites are known to exist within the Project area.
A closure and reclamation plan will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ’s Land Quality Division, as part of the Permit to Mine application. The closure objective as currently foreseen is to reclaim most of the site to enable the resumption of its current use of cattle grazing. Progressive reclamation will be practiced during the life of mine to reclaim portions of the Project site as soon as feasible prior to the end of mining, securing corresponding early releases in bonding obligations. Cattle grazing will continue as feasible during mining on Project areas not directly affected by mine operations. At the end of mineral processing operations, the mineral processing plant and support structures and facilities would be dismantled or demolished, and their footprints revegetated. The waste rock and tailings facilities would be regraded to the extent necessary to achieve long-term stability, covered and revegetated. Certain structures, roadways and/or wells may be left in place if requested by the landowners or State Lands Office.
Plans have been drawn up for the eventual back-filling of the open pit, however there are compelling reasons and initial evidence to suggest that the open pit can, with some modifications, be utilized as a long-term water storage facility as part of the network feeding the city of Cheyenne. Studies suggest that due to the growth in demand for water in the area, additional water storage facilities will be required to harvest water during the months when run-off is available. The CK Gold Project open pit could provide such storage as it appears that the excavation will hold water without deleterious effects on the water circulated. This may well avoid costly and invasive expansions to the existing storage impoundment in the Curt Gowdy State Park at the Crystal and Granite Lake reservoirs, or the construction of new impoundments. For the purpose of the base project case, pit backfill is not conducted based on the reasonable assumption that the end use of the CK Gold property does not include backfill of the final excavation.
Capital Costs, Operating Costs and Financial Analysis
An after tax, discounted cash flow model was developed to assess the economic performance of the CK Gold Project. This analysis relies on the mining schedule, capital and operating cost estimates, and recovery parameters contained within this report. The model assumes 100% equity funding, a 5% discount rate, a gold price of $1,625/oz, copper price of $3.25/lb. and silver price of $18/oz. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 1–5 and Table 1–6. The positive economic outcome of the financial analysis is used to delineate the CK Gold Mineral Reserve.
|Table 1–5 Economic Results|
|Key Project Indicator||Value|
|Pre-Tax Economics ($ Millions)|
|Cash Flow (Undiscounted)||$500|
|NPV 5% Discount Rate||$323|
|After Tax Results|
|Cash Flow (Undiscounted)||$421|
|NPV 5% Discount Rate||$266|
|Table 1–6 Project Details|
|Key Project Indicator||Value|
|Gold Ounces Recovered (000s)||706|
|Copper Recovered (Million Lbs.)||181|
|Silver Ounces Recovered (000s)||1,541|
|AuEq Ounces Recovered (000s)||1,085|
|Initial Capital ($ Million)||$222|
|Sustaining Capital ($ Million)||$15|
|Avg. Cash Cost of Production ($/oz AuEq)||$786|
|All in Sustaining Cost ($/oz AuEq)||$800|
A sensitivity analysis on metals pricing indicates additional potential for this project at higher metals pricing, see Table 1–7. Additionally, the sensitivity indicates the robustness of the project with positive economic outcomes at reduced metals pricing.
|Table 1–7 Metal Price Sensitivity|
|Metals Pricing||Pre-Tax||After Tax|
Conclusions and Recommendations
U.S. Gold’s CK Gold Project focuses on the historical Copper King deposit in the Silver Crown Mining district, the subject of sporadic mining activity for over 100 years. The CK Gold Project demonstrates a very low waste-to-ore ratio, the absence of a large pre-strip period to expose mineralization, simple low cost-mineral extraction, and proximity to key infrastructure and support services, which all favor positive project economics.
With a life of mine cash cost per equivalent gold ounce of $786/oz, the margin compared with both the study price, set at $1,625 per gold ounce and the gold price at the time of writing of approximately $1,800 per gold ounce, indicates robust project economics. The fact that the bulk of the revenue is split between sales of gold and copper suggests that the project may be less sensitive to cyclical swings in the prices of either individual metal. A unique feature of the CK Gold Project is its proximity to growing population centers and infrastructure, which may further offer opportunities to bolster revenue through the sale of waste rock as aggregate. Investigations have proven the non-mineralized rock to be of very good quality for aggregate products. Only a minor benefit for the aggregate potential has been recognized in this study, and more work is warranted to assess the full potential. To move bulk rock tonnages, some additional arrangements would need to be made but there is more than 30 million tons of rock available that could retail, as crushed and clean aggregate, at between $16 and $18 per ton and this potential value has not been fully captured in this study.
U.S. Gold elected to focus on data capture to support a feasibility study and permit application with its 2020 and 2021 field season activities. The resource model shows that there are potential extensions to the mineralization at depth and to the southeast of the deposit and these should be investigated. Additionally, there is uncertainty as to the genesis of the mineralization with the deposit not neatly fitting a porphyry or iron oxide copper gold (IOCG) type depositional model. The Company is set to support study work with the University of Wyoming, and the qualified persons recommend that efforts continue to better understand the geological setting and assess district potential.
In reviewing the Project, the qualified persons conclude that the type of mining, rate of mining and mineral processing technology selected in the PFS study is appropriate. While there is evidence to suggest that improved gold recoveries can be readily obtained through the implementation of flotation, followed by cyanidation of the flotation tailings, there are other factors and considerations that make the application of such technology difficult to assess. Not least of these considerations is public perception of the use of cyanide gold recovery. With the potential to recover an additional 180,000 gold ounces with the addition of a cyanide circuit, the qualified persons recommend that trade-off studies be conducted but tend to agree with U.S. Gold management that further studies and permitting be advanced without the inclusion of a cyanide circuit, under current price assumptions.
To advance the CK Gold Project the qualified persons recommended that a feasibility study is conducted to better define Project parameters and to advance engineering and planning for the CK Gold Project. The goal of the recommended Feasibility Study is to provide the directors of US Gold the information necessary to make an informed decision about the development of the Project. The estimated budget to complete this Feasibility Study is $500,000 based on the work completed to date on the Project.
Below is a list of the qualified persons involved in the preparation of this TRS.
- Donald Hulse, P.E., SME-RM V.P. and Principal Mining Engineer for Gustavson, is a Qualified Person as defined by SK-1300. Mr. Hulse acted as project manager during preparation of this report and is specifically responsible for report Sections 6, 7, and 8. Mr. Hulse is independent of U.S. Gold.
- Christopher Emanuel, SME-RM, Senior Mining Engineer for Gustavson, is a Qualified Person as defined by S-K 1300 and is specifically responsible for Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18 – 25. Mr. Emanuel is independent of U.S. Gold.
- Mark C. Shutty, B.Sc. is an independent Consulting Geologist, Member of American Institute of Professional Geologists (11664), Member of Geological Society of Nevada and Member of Society of Economic Geologists. Mr. Shutty has previously held the positions of Senior Geologist and Resource Geologist. He is a Qualified Person for S-K 1300 technical reporting and mineral inventory disclosure and is specifically responsible for Section 11. He has over 16 years of combined experience in exploration, mining and resource geology, working on a variety of projects across North America, including porphyry copper-gold deposits.
- John A. Wells BSc. MA, SAIMM, CIM-RM, Consultant Mineral Processing, is a Qualified Person as defined by S-K 1300 and is specifically responsible for Sections 10 and 14. Mr. Wells designed and oversaw the gathering of mineral sample for testing, the development of 2020-2021 test programs, and the interpretation of results. Mr. Wells also was engaged in the election of the process plant design engineering firm, overseeing the work accomplished, checking, and verifying the designs and estimates included in the study. Mr. Wells visited facilities engaged in the test work and maintained virtual contact with the process engineering design firm.
We have another exciting Nasdaq profile for today’s session.
This one has made some big moves over the past year and has strong following.
Pull up USAU immediately.
We may be in the midst of a generationally bullish period for mining stocks. The inflation genie is out of the bottle; rising prices and long-term yields are not keeping up. The Fed is still keeping interest rates at historic lows, and investors are potentially abandoning fixed-income assets and fleeing to bullion. This has created a potentially severe supply and demand imbalance. You couldn’t ask for any more potent potential catalyst for physical gold, and it could be getting even more powerful by the minute. The worse inflation gets, the better it is for gold. And it probably won’t end anytime soon. After all, on Oct 24 Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said that Americans haven’t experienced the current inflation rate “in a long time.” She further projected that inflation likely won’t improve until the latter half of 2022. The smaller exploration and development companies, though, could benefit the most from current market conditions. According to John Corcoran, senior client portfolio manager for Invesco, “Gold and precious metals equities have historically outperformed the price of gold by twofold to threefold when both bullion and precious metals mining stocks are rising.”
Mounting Potential Catalysts Could Help USAU’s CK Gold Project Generate Millions
As USAU charges towards potentially becoming a household name among investors, it’s the company’s CK Gold Project that’s catching the ears and eyes of many. After all, one of Barrick Gold’s former top executives, George Bee, became CEO of U.S. Gold Corp. United States NASDAQ: (USAU). The CK Gold Project was a significant reason why.
Bee said, “I took a look at the CK Gold Project, did my due diligence, and it has a lot going for it.”
CK Gold could drive USAU to new heights for too many reasons to count. So let’s break down some of the top ones. For one, it could be a diamond in the rough and a ground floor play on inflation. Inflation is not transitory, as the Fed tried to tell us in April, and could persist well into the new year. Not to mention, we’re in the midst of a supply chain crisis that’s only adding to this soaring inflation. According to Goldman Sachs, the supply chain crisis has gotten so bad that there is a traffic jam of roughly 77 ships with $24 billion worth of goods outside the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. About 40% of U.S. imports enter through these ports. Have fun paying for your Thanksgiving turkey and finding your kid’s Christmas presents this year. Until this gets fixed, inflation will not improve. Which means potentially big things for gold and USAU. The last time inflation got this bad was in 1971. Gold, at one point, nearly tripled in one day from $42 to $120, and we could be seeing the same type of conditions today. On Oct 25, 2021, gold again crossed the $1800 level and rallied as much as 7.81% between Aug 9 and Oct 25.Additionally, CK Gold is in an advantageous location in mineral-rich Wyoming. The importance of geographic location cannot be overstated. Wyoming is very friendly for the resource sector with less regulation and out of Federal jurisdiction. Meaning the project can get to production much faster.
“There is a lot of infrastructure very close by, including a rail spur and a rail line 2.5 miles north of the project. The company can potentially ship diesel fuel in, shift concentrate out, and have a lot of future cost savings.” – Ed Karr, Founder.
The state sure seems excited by the prospects, too, with recent local news articles hyping up the company with such headlines as “Cheyenne May Soon Boast The Only Working Gold Mine In The State of Wyoming” and “Potential Gold Copper Mine Could Generate Millions For State.” If continued data collection bears out hopes, the CK Gold Project could produce tens of millions in revenue for the state. Jason Begger, the spokesperson for the CK Gold Project, claims that the project becomes more certain and confident with every bit of data collected. The mine site is owned by the state and located in an old copper mine that hasn’t been worked on since before World War II. The gold deposit has been known to exist for a long time. Finally, new mining technology has reached a point where experts think it could be worth reopening. If the project continues to move forward at this pace, Begger said they estimate the financial boon to the state could be in the tens of millions.
“We have partnered with the University of Wyoming and their economic analysis division, and they’ll be completing an economic impact analysis of both tax revenue to the State of Wyoming, vendors, sales tax – the kind of broader impacts – so that is in the works,” he said.
“It’s a nice shot in the arm for the state of Wyoming,” he said.
Perhaps, the most outstanding feature of the CK Gold Project is its simplicity. It’s an open-pit mine which means its copper and gold concentrates are at surface level. This can make operations much more efficient and eco-friendly. Additionally, the property has a meager stripping ratio. This translates to high productivity, low operating costs, and good safety conditions from a pure investment standpoint. So buckle up. USAU saw considerable activity at the CK Gold Project during the summer. It is continuing throughout fall 2021, and USAU expects to further advance the project to a permitting and development decision on a fast-track basis. Highlights of recent activities include:
- After the site wetlands survey, the CK Gold Project received a non-jurisdictional determination from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
- Signed land and right-of-way agreement securing the project’s footprint and access across private and onto State land (no Federal land is involved).
- Extensive local engagement and a new project-specific website, located at www.ckgoldmine.com, has been launched.
- Prefeasibility Study (“PFS”) expected by year-end 2021, currently undergoing optimization.
- Advancing Feasibility Study (“FS”) fieldwork, building on PFS for anticipated FS completion by mid-2022.
- Ongoing environmental baseline monitoring for potential filing of Mine Permit application in 2022.
Kevin Francis, Vice President of Exploration & Technical Services for U.S. Gold Corp. stated, “We are presently on track to complete our CK Gold Project PFS by year-end. By design, we have gone well beyond what would normally be necessary for a PFS so that we can move on to evaluate the project at the FS level by the middle of 2022. Our field and laboratory studies are designed to bridge any gap in the PFS, which will allow us to progress seamlessly into a full feasibility study. We continue to gather supplemental data necessary from the project site during the 2021 summer and autumn field season, which is scheduled to conclude in November. Environmental baseline monitoring continues, having started in September 2020, with the objective of being in a position to submit a permit application to the State of Wyoming once a development decision has been made. While a development decision is contingent on many factors, we are very encouraged by what we have seen.”
With Tesla Exceeding a $1 Trillion Market Cap, The Global Copper Shortage and EV Boom May Have Created a Historic Opportunity
Let’s talk a bit about Tesla. On Oct 25, 2021, Hertz announced a record-setting order of 100,000 Teslas for its fleet, causing the stock to skyrocket over 12%, and send it to a $1 trillion+ market cap. Elon Musk’s EV giant not only became the 6th company in history to exceed the $1 trillion mark. It became the 2nd fastest ever to do so. Globally speaking, copper is strategically essential. Industries that produce solar panels, windmills, and electric vehicles are frantically looking for more and more supply. But do you know what each brand new Tesla requires? Around 80 kg (176 lbs) of copper! The potential for copper makes US Gold Corp (NASDAQ:USAU) even more intriguing, outside of being a potential inflation hedge. While the CK Project is estimated to hold nearly 700,000 ounces of gold awaiting extraction, the company estimates the mine has a mind-blowing 230 million pounds of copper. Other estimates show that the CK mine may hold enough copper to build about a million electric vehicles. Another significant catalyst to consider is its location. It’s located roughly 2 miles north of a central East-West Union Pacific rail line, giving it potentially easy rail access to Tesla’s Nevada Gigafactory. To possibly be THE copper supplier for the world’s latest $1 trillion giant could be game-changing. It’s not just Tesla, though, that could cause this property to see a surge in copper demand. Traditional automakers like General Motors Co. and Ford are going electric, which means a supply boom is expected, causing copper demand to soar. This could be American copper from a future American mine, creating American jobs. CK spokesman, Jason Begger, was also sure to point out that as Wyoming and the country embrace new technologies like EVs, manufacturers will require a lot of copper – copper the CK Gold Project could produce. Begger also added that the project is roughly a 10-year operation. Meanwhile, to add to the theme of sustainability, the CK Gold Project should run far cleaner. The company does not intend to use hazardous chemicals; there’s no refinery or air-polluting smokestack. In fact, the hole in the ground can potentially be used for water storage for the city of Cheyenne. There could even be other deals for the waste rock, adding even more revenue potential and reducing environmental impact. Another significant usage of copper is wind turbines. Wyoming for decades profited from the coal mining industry but is now one of the states leading the way in the future of clean energy. Wyoming is the largest exporter of energy in the United States and ranks first in land-based class 6 and 7 wind turbine sites. Trafigura Group believes copper could hit $15,000 a ton over the next decade, according to Bloomberg. After all, “You can’t move to a green economic environment and not have the copper price moving significantly higher,” says Kostas Bintas, a trader at Trafigura. “How can you have one without the other?”
You can see more about the CK Gold Project below.
A Regional “Player to Watch” Exploring Untapped Promise in the World’s 5th Largest Gold-Producing “Country”
Its Wyoming operations with the CK Project are its bread and butter. Yet USAU is also exploring a project with untapped potential in Nevada, aka the 5th largest gold-producing “country” in the world. In fact, in 2017 alone, Nevada claimed to have seen roughly 5.6 million oz. of gold produced, accounting for approximately 75% of American gold production. Historically, the region has also produced approximately 225 million oz. of gold. Thanks to Nevada’s pro-mining environment, geopolitical stability, and high-quality infrastructure, this could be yet another bullish catalyst for U.S. Gold. After all, INN Gold Investing News recently deemed U.S. Gold Corp. United States NASDAQ: (USAU) a regional “player to watch.” U.S. Gold Corp. is currently exploring for gold in the Keystone project in the heart of the Cortez Gold Trend. It’s also about 10 miles south of Barrick’s Cortez Hills Mine Complex. Even more impressive, the trend appears to host numerous deposits:
- Barrick’s Pipeline: ~21+ M oz gold
- Barrick’s Cortez Hills: ~15+ M oz gold
- Barrick’s Goldrush: ~10+ M oz gold
In May 2021, the company received confirmation from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that it accepted additional bonding for a further 50 acres of disturbance under its effective Plan of Operations. As a result, the company announced an update for its potential 2021 summer exploration program at its 20-square-mile Keystone project, located in Nevada’s Cortez Trend. Ken Coleman, U.S. Gold Corp.’s Chief Geologist, stated:
“All of us were encouraged with our previous drilling results and feel strongly that additional exploration efforts are warranted in select target areas. Extensive ongoing analysis has brought us to this point, and we are excited to continue to test Keystone’s potential. Encountering the strongest, thickest gold mineralization, in the Nina Skarn target, has demonstrated the presence of a strong, gold-bearing Eocene magmatic-hydrothermal system at Keystone.”
Beyond Cortez Trend, U.S. Gold Corp. United States NASDAQ: (USAU) Has Staked Its Claim Where Nevada’s Gold Boom Started Along With Another Project in Idaho
U.S. Gold Corp. (United States NASDAQ: (USAU) is also exploring Maggie Creek. Maggie Creek, a project located on the Carlin Trend- another one of the world’s most highly prospective mineral trends. Maggie Creek is located roughly 10 miles northeast of Newmont Mining’s Gold Quarry Mine. Additionally, there could be nearly three square miles of unpatented mining claims on this potentially gold-rich project (26 M oz Au). Furthermore, back in June, U.S. Gold Corp. announced the successful completion of 2021 Drilling at Maggie Creek. U.S. Gold Corp. drilled 4,440 feet (approx. 1,353 meters) in 2 holes. Drilling successfully identified targeted structure, host stratigraphy, and Carlin-style alteration at similar depths to current mining operations along the Carlin Gold Belt. Most of all, the strength of alteration and anomalous geochemistry warrant potential additional exploration. In addition to Maggie Creek, U.S. Gold Corp. boasts the Challis Gold Project, another project with significant upside exploration potential. It’s located about 75 km southwest of Salmon, ID, and 20 km southwest of Revival Gold’s Beartrack Project in the Tertiary Challis Volcanic Field. The project is also located close to the Stibnite Au project, Bear Track Au project, Delamar Ag-Au mine, Coeur d’Alene Ag- Zn-Pb mines, Black Pine Au mine, and Thompson Creek Mo mine. Ken Coleman, U.S. Gold Corp.’s Chief Geologist, added:
“There are several opportunities at Challis, including further exploration of cobalt-copper showings on the project and developing a better structural picture of low-strip-ratio existing gold resources with upside expansion potential. Challis has an historic (not-current) NI 43-101 geological report showing a 313,825-ounce gold inferred mineral resource at a grade of 1.22 grams per ton. Our whole team believes that with additional exploration, Challis has the potential to become a significant resource.”
USAU Has Outperformed With a Breakout That May Just Be Starting
U.S. Gold Corp. Announces Participation at the H.C. Wainwright Mining Conference November 30 – December 1, 2021 (Virtual Conference)
U.S. Gold Corp. to Attend and Present at the 2021 Precious Metals Summit Europe (Virtual) on November 15, 2021
U.S. Gold Corp. Discusses Upcoming Pre-Feasibility Study for its CK Gold Project at the Benzinga Sector Agnostic Conference on October 27th & 28th
U.S. Gold Corp. Outlines 2021 Field Season Activities and Provides Update on the Pre-Feasibility Study for the CK Gold Project
U.S. Gold Corp. to Attend and Present at the 2021 Denver Gold Group Gold Forum Americas Conference (Hybrid) on September 13, 2021
U.S. Gold Corp. to Attend and Present at the 2021 Precious Metals Summit Beaver Creek Conference (Hybrid) on September 9, 2021
PRESIDENT, CEO AND CHAIRMAN
Mr. Bee is a senior mining industry executive, with deep mine development and operational experience. He has an extensive career advancing world-class gold mining projects in eight countries on three continents for both major and junior mining companies. Most recently in 2018 Mr. Bee concluded a third term with Barrick Gold as Senior VP Frontera District in Chile and Argentina to advance Pascua Lama feasibility as an underground mine. This capped a 16-year history with Barrick Gold with positions that included Mine Manager at Goldstrike during early development and operations, Operations Manager at Pierina Mine taking Pierina from construction to operations, and General Manager of Veladero developing the project from advanced exploration through permitting, feasibility and into production.
With his Barrick experience and having had eight years in South Africa working underground gold with Anglo American and open pit copper with Rio Tinto at Palabora Mine, Mr. Bee was well placed to advance projects internationally and domestically as a senior executive. This led to his appointment to various board and leadership positions at various companies. As COO of Aurelian Resources in 2007, he was in charge of project development for Fruta del Norte in Ecuador until Aurelian was acquired by Kinross Gold in 2008. Post-acquisition, moving on from Kinross, where he had also previously worked from 1996 to 1998 advancing projects in El Salvador and Nevada, he joined Andina Minerals as CEO in 2009. Andina and its 6 million-ounce Volcan Gold Project in Chile was acquired by Hochschild in 2013. By this time Mr. Bee had been appointed to the boards of Peregrine Metals and later Stillwater Mining and Jaguar Mining. In 2014, he also assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer of Jaguar Mining, operating mines in Brazil, as the company emerged from a financial restructuring process.
Mr. Bee is a graduate of the Camborne School of Mines in Cornwall, United Kingdom and is a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors with an ICD.D designation.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CORPORATE SECRETARY
Mr. Eric Alexander has over 30 years of corporate, operational and business experience, and over 15 years of mining industry experience. Previously he served as Corporate Controller of Helix Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded software and technology company from April 2019 to September 2020. Prior to that, he served as the Vice President Finance and Controller of Pershing Gold Corporation, a mining company (formerly NASDAQ: PGLC), from September 2012 until April 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Alexander was the Corporate Controller for Sunshine Silver Mines Corporation, a privately held mining company with exploration and pre-development properties in Idaho and Mexico, from March 2011 to August 2012. He was a consultant to Hein & Associates LLP from August 2012 to September 2012 and a Manager with Hein & Associates LLP from July 2010 to March 2011. He served from July 2007 to May 2010 as the Corporate Controller for Golden Minerals Company (and its predecessor, Apex Silver Mines Limited), a publicly traded mining company with operations and exploration activities in South America and Mexico. In addition to his direct experience in the mining industry, he has also held the position of Senior Manager with the public accounting firm KPMG LLP, focusing on mining and energy clients. Mr. Alexander has a B.S. in Business Administration (concentrations in Accounting and Finance) from the State University of New York at Buffalo and is also a licensed CPA.
VICE PRESIDENT – EXPLORATION & TECHNICAL SERVICES
Mr. Francis has held many senior roles within the mining industry, including VP of Project Development for Aurcana Corporation, VP of Technical Services for Oracle Mining Corporation, VP of Resources for NovaGold Resources and Principal Geologist for AMEC Mining and Metals. Most recently, he consulted to U.S. Gold Corp. as Principal of Mineral Resource Management LLC, a consultancy providing technical leadership to the mining industry, as well as the CK Gold Project through his association with Gustavson Associates (a member of WSP) since September 2020. Mr. Francis is a member of the Board of Directors of Texas Mineral Resources Corporation. Mr. Francis is a “Qualified Person” as defined by SEC S-K 1300 and Canadian NI 43-101 reporting standards and holds both an M.S. degree and a B.A. in geology from the University of Colorado.